Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Artificial intelligence-based pulmonary embolism classification: Development and validation using real-world data.

Luan Oliveira da Silva, Maria Carolina Bueno da Silva, Guilherme Alberto Sousa Ribeiro, Thiago Fellipe Ortiz de Camargo, Paulo Victor Dos Santos, Giovanna de Souza Mendes, Joselisa Peres Queiroz de Paiva, Anderson da Silva Soares, Márcio Rodrigues da Cunha Reis, Rafael Maffei Loureiro and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Limitations and Future Perspectives on Pulmonary Embolism: So Far, So Good.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luan Oliveira da SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-6391
Maria Carolina Bueno da SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Alberto Sousa RibeiroDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Fellipe Ortiz de CamargoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Victor Dos SantosDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Giovanna de Souza MendesDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Joselisa Peres Queiroz de PaivaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson da Silva SoaresInstitute of Informatics (INF), Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Márcio Rodrigues da Cunha ReisDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Maffei LoureiroDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1635-2225
Wesley Pacheco CalixtoElectrical, Mechanical & Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1928-4432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an artificial intelligence-based classification model for the detection of pulmonary embolism in computed tomography angiography. The proposed model, developed from public data and validated on a large dataset from a tertiary hospital, uses a two-dimensional approach that integrates temporal series to classify each slice of the examination and make predictions at both slice and examination levels. The training process consists of two stages: first using a convolutional neural network InceptionResNet V2 and then a recurrent neural network long short-term memory model. This approach achieved an accuracy of 93% at the slice level and 77% at the examination level. External validation using a hospital dataset resulted in a precision of 86% for positive pulmonary embolism cases and 69% for negative pulmonary embolism cases. Notably, the model excels in excluding pulmonary embolism, achieving a precision of 73% and a recall of 82%, emphasizing its clinical value in reducing unnecessary interventions. In addition, the diverse demographic distribution in the validation dataset strengthens the model's generalizability. Overall, this model offers promising potential for accurate detection and exclusion of pulmonary embolism, potentially streamlining diagnosis and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyNeural Networks, ComputerPulmonary EmbolismAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39167612
PMCPMC11338462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.