Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167598›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Cutting consumption without diluting the experience: Preferences for different tactics for reducing alcohol consumption among increasing-and-higher-risk drinkers based on drinking context.

Melissa Oldham, Tosan Okpako, Corinna Leppin, Claire Garnett, Larisa-Maria Dina, Abigail Stevely, Andrew Jones, John Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa OldhamDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-9152
Tosan OkpakoDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-8280
Corinna LeppinDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-1937
Claire GarnettSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Larisa-Maria DinaDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, United Kingdom.
Abigail StevelyPopulation Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-5245
Andrew JonesSchool of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
John HolmesPopulation Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contexts in which people drink vary. Certain drinking contexts may be more amenable to change than others and the effectiveness of alcohol reduction tactics may differ across contexts. This study aimed to explore how helpful context-specific tactics for alcohol reduction were perceived as being amongst increasing-and-higher-risk drinkers. Using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy, context-specific tactics to reduce alcohol consumption were developed by the research team and revised following consultation with experts in behaviour change. In four focus groups (two online, two in-person), N = 20 adult increasing-and-higher-risk drinkers in the UK discussed how helpful tactics developed for four drinking contexts would be: drinking at home alone (19 tactics), drinking at home with partner or family (21 tactics), in the pub with friends (23 tactics), and a meal out of the home (20 tactics). Transcripts were analysed using constant comparison methods. Participants endorsed four broad approaches to reducing alcohol consumption which encompassed all the individual tactics developed by the research team: Diluting and substituting drinks for those containing less alcohol (e.g. switching to soft drinks or no- or low-alcohol drinks); Reducing external pressure to drink (e.g. setting expectations in advance); Creating barriers to drinking (e.g. not buying alcohol to keep at home or storing it in less visible places), and Setting new habits (e.g. breaking old patterns and taking up new hobbies). Three cross-cutting themes influenced how applicable these approaches were to different drinking contexts. These were: Situational pressure, Drinking motives, and Financial motivation. Diluting and substituting drinks which enabled covert reduction and Reducing external pressure to drink were favoured in social drinking contexts. Diluting and substituting drinks which enabled participants to feel that they were having 'a treat' or which facilitated relaxation and Creating barriers to drinking were preferred at home. Interventions to reduce alcohol consumption should offer tactics tailored to individuals' drinking contexts and which account for context-specific individual and situational pressure to drink.

Identifiers

PMID39167598
PMCPMC11338454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.