ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Improving accuracy of GPT-3/4 results on biomedical data using a retrieval-augmented language model.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Equity-Centered Sociotechnical Architecture for Generative AI Integration in Public Health Promotion: Conceptual Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- MedDiscover: A Domain-Specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Evidence-Grounded Knowledge Extraction in Metabolomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating the appropriateness and safety of generative AI in delivering lifestyle guidance for atrial fibrillation patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Large Language Models for Improved Accuracy and Safety in Medical Question Answering: Comparative Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Mechanistically Explainable AI Model for Predicting Synergistic Cancer Therapy Combinations.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Improving automated deep phenotyping through large language models using retrieval-augmented generation.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Retrieval augmented generation for large language models in healthcare: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Thyro-GenAI: A Chatbot Using Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models for Personalized Thyroid Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Two-Layer Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Low-Resource Medical Question Answering Using Reddit Data: Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Large language models for disease diagnosis: a scoping review.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- A comprehensive evaluation of large language models in mining gene relations and pathway knowledge.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- LmRaC: a functionally extensible tool for LLM interrogation of user experimental results.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Enhancement of the Performance of Large Language Models in Diabetes Education through Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Mining Gene Interactions and Pathway Knowledge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- GastroBot: a Chinese gastrointestinal disease chatbot based on the retrieval-augmented generation.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have made a significant impact on the fields of general artificial intelligence. General purpose LLMs exhibit strong logic and reasoning skills and general world knowledge but can sometimes generate misleading results when prompted on specific subject areas. LLMs trained with domain-specific knowledge can reduce the generation of misleading information (i.e. hallucinations) and enhance the precision of LLMs in specialized contexts. Training new LLMs on specific corpora however can be resource intensive. Here we explored the use of a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) model which we tested on literature specific to a biomedical research area. OpenAI's GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Microsoft's Prometheus, and a custom RAG model were used to answer 19 questions pertaining to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) disease biology and treatment. Eight independent reviewers assessed LLM responses based on accuracy, relevance, and readability, rating responses on a 3-point scale for each category. These scores were then used to compare LLM performance. The performance of the LLMs varied across scoring categories. On accuracy and relevance, the RAG model outperformed other models with higher scores on average and the most top scores across questions. GPT-4 was more comparable to the RAG model on relevance versus accuracy. By the same measures, GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 had the highest scores for readability of answers when compared to the other LLMs. GPT-4 and 3.5 also had more answers with hallucinations than the other LLMs, due to non-existent references and inaccurate responses to clinical questions. Our findings suggest that an oncology research-focused RAG model may outperform general-purpose LLMs in accuracy and relevance when answering subject-related questions. This framework can be tailored to Q&A in other subject areas. Further research will help understand the impact of LLM architectures, RAG methodologies, and prompting techniques in answering questions across different subject areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.