Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167568›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Increased alertness and moderate ingroup cohesion in bonobos' response to outgroup cues.

James Brooks, Karlijn van Heijst, Amanda Epping, Seok Hwan Lee, Aslihan Niksarli, Amy Pope, Zanna Clay, Mariska E Kret, Jared Taglialatela, Shinya Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James BrooksInstitute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6700-8283
Karlijn van HeijstInstitute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-3507
Amanda EppingApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, Iowa, United States of America.
Seok Hwan LeeWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Aslihan NiksarliDepartment of Anthropology, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Amy PopeDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Zanna ClayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Mariska E KretDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jared TaglialatelaApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, Iowa, United States of America.
Shinya YamamotoInstitute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a number of species, including humans, perceived outgroup threat can promote ingroup cohesion. However, the distribution and selection history of this association across species with varied intergroup relations remains unclear. Using a sample of 8 captive groups (N = 43 individuals), we here tested whether bonobos, like chimpanzees, show more affiliative ingroup behaviour following perception of outgroup cues (unfamiliar male long-distance vocalisations). We used comparable methods to our previous study of captive chimpanzees, and found that, although weaker, there was an association for more frequent social grooming in response to the outgroup condition than the control condition, alongside more alert posture and increased self-directed behaviour. This provides preliminary evidence for an ancestral origin to the proximate association between outgroup cues and ingroup cohesion, at least prior to the Pan-Homo split, and suggests the presence of intergroup competition in our last common ancestor.

Indexed as

CuesPan paniscusSocial BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID39167568
PMCPMC11338468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.