ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Complementary Nanoparticle Characterization by Resistive-Pulse Sensing, Electron Microscopy, and Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate Sizing and Resolution of Nominal 200 nm Diameter Polystyrene Nanospheres With Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Learning from Metal Nanocrystal Heterogeneity: A Need for Information-Rich and High-Throughput Single-Nanocrystal Measurements.ACS nanoscience Au · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanotechnology has provided novel modalities for the delivery of therapeutic and diagnostic agents. In particular, nanoparticles (NPs) can be engineered at a low cost for drug loading and delivery. For example, silica NPs have proven useful as a controlled release platform for anti-inflammatory drugs. Despite the wide-ranging potential applications for NPs, robust characterization across all size ranges remains elusive. Electron microscopy (EM) is the conventional tool for measuring NP diameters. However, imitations in throughput and the inability to provide comprehensive information on physical properties, such as mass and density, without underlying assumptions, hinder a complete analysis. In addition, assessing sample heterogeneity, aggregation, or coalescence in solution by traditional EM analysis is not possible. Resistive-pulse sensing (RPS) provides a high throughput, solution-phase method for characterizing particle heterogeneity based on volume. Complementing these methods, charge detection mass spectrometry (CD-MS), a single particle technique, provides accurate mass information for heterogeneous samples including NPs. By combining EM, RPS and CD-MS, accurate volume, mass, and densities were obtained for silica NPs of various sizes. The results show that the density for 20 nm silica NPs is close to the density of fused silica (2.2 g/cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.