Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167406›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Maternal Characteristics and Prevalence of Infants Born Small for Gestational Age.

Liangcheng Xiang, Xiaohong Li, Yi Mu, Peiran Chen, Yanxia Xie, Yanping Wang, Li Dai, Zheng Liu, Qi Li, Mingrong Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of maternal health on neonatal and long-term kidney outcomes.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. [Analysis of Maternal Pregnancy Characteristics and Adverse Neonatal Birth Outcomes at a Single Center From 2017 to 2022].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Liangcheng XiangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaohong LiNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yi MuNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Peiran ChenNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yanxia XieNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yanping WangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Li DaiNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zheng LiuNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qi LiNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mingrong LiNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Juan LiangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jun ZhuNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a risk factor for neonatal mortality and adverse outcomes in the short and long term. The maternal profile in China has substantially changed over the past decade, which may affect the risk of infants born SGA. Objectives: To analyze the prevalence of infants born SGA from 2012 through 2020 and explore the association of maternal sociodemographic characteristics and other factors with that prevalence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined data from the National Maternal Near Miss Surveillance System on women who delivered singleton live births at gestational ages of 28 to 42 weeks from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020, in China. Statistical analysis was performed from December 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: Characteristics of delivery (year, region of country, and hospital level), mother (age, educational level, marital status, prenatal visits, parity, preexisting diseases, or prenatal complications), and newborn (birth weight, sex, and gestational age). Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of infants born SGA stratified by severity and by region of the country, changes in prevalence based on log-linear Poisson regression with robust variance, and association of maternal characteristics with changes in prevalence of infants born SGA between 2012 and 2020 based on the Fairlie nonlinear mean decomposition. Results: Among 12 643 962 births (6 572 548 [52.0%] male; median gestational age, 39 weeks [IQR, 38-40 weeks]), the overall weighted prevalence of infants born SGA was 6.4%, which decreased from 7.3% in 2012 to 5.3% in 2020, translating to a mean annual decrease rate of 3.9% (95% CI, 3.3%-4.5%). The prevalence of infants born SGA decreased from 2.0% to 1.2% for infants with severe SGA birth weight and from 5.3% to 4.1% for those with mild to moderate SGA birth weight. The mean annual rate of decrease was faster for infants with severe SGA birth weight than for those with mild to moderate SGA birth weight (5.9% [95% CI, 4.6%-7.1%] vs 3.2% [95% CI, 2.6%-3.8%]) and was faster for the less developed western (5.3% [95% CI, 4.4%-6.1%]) and central (3.9% [95% CI, 2.9%-4.8%]) regions compared with the eastern region (2.3% [95% CI, 1.1%-3.4%]). Two-thirds of the observed decrease in the prevalence of infants born SGA could be accounted for by changes in maternal characteristics, such as educational level (relative association, 19.7%), age (relative association, 18.8%), prenatal visits (relative association, 20.4%), and parity (relative association, 19.4%). Conversely, maternal preexisting diseases or prenatal complications counteracted the decrease in the prevalence of infants born SGA (-6.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of births in China from 2012 to 2020, maternal characteristics changed and the prevalence of infants born SGA decreased. Future interventions to reduce the risk of infants born SGA should focus on primary prevention.

Indexed as

Infant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39167406
PMCPMC11339661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.