The Effect of Telehealth on Spending-Reframing the Debate.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Remote assessment of exercise capacity in adults with chronic respiratory disease: Safety, reliability and acceptability.Chronic respiratory disease
   Trial
2. Telemedicine Use and Access to Care for New Patients at an Academic Cardiovascular Center: An Analysis of Geographic Reach and Wait Times.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
   Article
3. Real-World Comparison of Telemonitoring Versus Conventional Care in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Those With Asthma-Impact on Clinical Outcomes and Patient Characteristics: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
   Observational

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.