SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2024
Dendritic cell vaccine for glioblastoma: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaccine-based cancer immunotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Personalized neoantigen-pulsed autologous dendritic cells in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase Ib trial.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cannabidiol in Gliomas: Therapeutic Potential and Nanocarrier Strategies, with an Emphasis on Vesicular Delivery Systems.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Combined Tumor Cell and Lysate-Based Vaccines for Immunotherapy of Primary and Recurrent Glioblastoma (GBM).Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDendritic cell (DC) vaccine is an emerging immunotherapy that could potentially improve glioblastoma survival. The first phase III clinical trial of DC vaccine was recently published. This meta-analysis aims to update and reappraise existing evidence on the efficacy of DC vaccine in patients with glioblastoma.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials of DC vaccine for glioblastoma. The quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The results of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Summary effects were evaluated using random effects models. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.
resultsSeven clinical trials involving 3,619 patients were included. DC vaccine plus standard care was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 - 0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43 - 0.98). In the subgroup of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, DC vaccine was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 - 0.90). TSA of OS showed that the cumulative z-score line for the DC vaccine crossed the benefit boundary and reached the required sample size. TSA of PFS and subgroup analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma showed that the required sample size was not reached.
conclusionsThis updated meta-analysis, which included the first phase III trial of a DC vaccine for glioblastoma, demonstrated that the DC vaccine was associated with improved OS. Moreover, TSA showed that the required sample size was reached, indicating a true-positive result. Future studies are required for patient subgroups with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39167243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.