Trial reportEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
Are positional screws superior to lag screws in fixation of medial malleolar fractures? A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous versus open cannulated screws fixation for displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures in adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Trial
- The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Ankle Fractures.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is no consensus about the best fixation method for medial malleolar fractures. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiological results of positional (fully threaded) screws and lag (partially threaded) screws when used to fix medial malleolar fractures.
methodsThis prospective, randomized clinical trial included 68 patients with closed isolated medial malleolar fractures. Each study arm included 34 patients who were randomly treated with either fully threaded screws (FT group) or partially threaded screws (PT group). Patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot score.
resultsAfter a 12-month follow-up, the mean AOFAS ankle hindfoot score was 92.1 ± 3.5 in the FT group and 91.8 ± 5.4 in the PT group. Union was achieved in the FT group after a mean of 6.2 ± 1.3 weeks and after a mean of 6.5 ± 1.5 weeks in the PT group.
conclusionBoth fully threaded and partially threaded screws yielded good comparable clinical and radiological outcomes when used to fix isolated medial malleolar fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39167207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.