ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025
Vascular function in patients with advanced heart failure and continuous-flow or pulsatile ventricular assist devices.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The interplay between pulsatility, sympathetic regulation and renal physiology: Implications for left ventricular assist devices.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA significant proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) progress to an advanced stage, which is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. These patients may be eligible for advanced treatment strategies such as mechanical circulatory support with ventricular assist devices (VAD). Vascular dysfunction is a hallmark of heart failure pathophysiology and prognosis. However, whether and to what degree the hemodynamic benefits of VADs influence vascular function remain unknown. METHODS AND
resultsIn this study, we evaluated endothelial vascular function with flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) and with flicker-light induced retinal vasodilatation (FID). 34 patients with a VAD (age 58 ± 10 years, 85% male, 74% ischemic heart disease, 26 continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, and 8 pulsatile biventricular (bi)-VAD) were compared to 34 propensity-matched patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 68% male, 59% ischemic heart disease) with advanced HF (AdvHF). Endothelial function of larger arteries (FMD) was significantly better in patients after VAD implantation compared to matched AdvHF patients (7.2 ± 4.6% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, p = 0.03), whereas microvascular arteriolar function (FIDart) did not differ (0.99 ± 1.43% vs. 1.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.78). The arterio-venous ratio (AVR) was higher in the VAD group (0.90 ± 0.06 vs 0.85 ± 0.09, p = 0.01), reflecting wider retinal arteriolar and narrower venular diameters. There was no difference in vascular function between patients with CF-LVAD and pulsatile Bi-VAD.
conclusionIn patients with advanced heart failure, VAD implantation was associated with better endothelial function at the level of large arteries, but not in the microcirculation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.