ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2025
Fractal analysis of mandibular trabecular pattern following protraction facemask therapy : A pilot study.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the remodeling effects of protraction facemask therapy on the trabecular pattern of the mandible and identify quantitatively the regions of the mandible undergoing maximum changes in the trabecular pattern. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe retrospective study was conducted in 30 subjects divided into two groups. The treatment group (group 1) consisted of 15 subjects with skeletal class III malocclusion treated with a facemask (mean age: 9.1 ± 2.1 years). Digital panoramic radiographs (OPG) were obtained before treatment (T0) and at the end of active facemask therapy (T1) with a mean duration of 16.1 ± 2.5 months. In all, 15 skeletal class I subjects who did not undergo any orthodontic treatment (mean age 9.1 ± 2.2 years) comprised the control group (group 2) who had two OPGs at a mean interval of 13.6 ± 2.2 months. The fractal dimensional (FD) value was calculated in three regions: angular, condylar, and corpus region.
resultsIntragroup comparisons revealed a significant increase in the FD values in the right condylar (T0 = 1.2 ± 0.2; T1 = 1.4 ± 0.1) and left condylar (T0 = 1.2 ± 0.1; T1 = 1.4 ± 0.1) region (p < 0.05) and in the corpus region (FD values: right T0 = 1.2 ± 0.1, T1 = 1.4 ± 0.1; left T0 = 1.2 ± 0.1, T1 = 1.4 ± 0.1; p < 0.05). The intergroup comparison demonstrated that the treatment group showed greater changes compared with the controls in the condylar process (mean difference: right = 0.19, left = 0.20; p < 0.05) and the corpus region (0.172; p < 0.05).
conclusionFD analysis demonstrated that the condylar process and the corpus region underwent the most significant change in the trabecular pattern in subjects treated with protraction facemask therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39167158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.