Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39167020›Full record

Observational studyActa orthopaedica2024

Incidence and survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Denmark 1998-2021: a nationwide register-based study.

Julius T Hald, Anders B El-Galaly, Michael M Petersen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Robin Christensen, Anders Odgaard

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julius T HaldDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University julius.tetens.hald@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-2946
Anders B El-GalalyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University.
Michael M PetersenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-6420
Martin Lindberg-LarsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-677X
Robin ChristensenSection for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen; Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6600-0631
Anders OdgaardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.ORCID 0000-0002-4841-518X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary aim of our study was to identify the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties based on nationwide register data. The secondary aim was to determine the change in the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of primary knee arthroplasties using several nationwide Danish registers. All primary knee arthroplasties performed in Denmark from 1998 to 2021 were identified. From these primary arthroplasties, revision procedures were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots were used in survival analysis to estimate the likelihood of implant survival.

results161,384 primary knee arthroplasties and their revisions performed between 1998 and 2021 were identified; of 13,786 (8.5%) revisions there were 10,638 1st revisions, 2,148 2nd revisions, 624 3rd revisions, 223 4th revisions, and 153 procedures that had been revised more than 4 times. The 10-year revision-free survival of primary arthroplasties was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-92.5). First-time revisions had a 10-year revision-free survival of 75.9% (CI 74.9-76.9). The 10-year survival of second- and third-time revisions was 65.1% (CI 62.6-67.6) and 57.8% (CI 53.4-62.5), respectively. The 10-year implant survival probabilities of primary knee arthroplasties were 91.4% in 1998-2009 and 93.3% in 2010-2021 (difference 2.2%). The 10-year implant survival probabilities of 1st revisions were 77% in 1998-2009 and 75% in 2010-2021 (difference -2.4%).

conclusionWe found that 0.3% of all primary knee arthroplasties resulted in 3 or more revisions. The implant survival decreased for each consecutive revision, with almost half of the 3rd revisions being re-revised within 10 years. The 10-survival of the primary implant was higher in 2010-2021, and the 10-year survival of the 1st revision was higher in 1998-2009.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis FailureRegistriesReoperationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39167020
PMCPMC11337950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.