Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166858›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Factors governing attachment of

Jack D Parsons, Clare R Cocker, Alison K East, Rachel M Wheatley, Vinoy K Ramachandran, Farnusch Kaschani, Markus Kaiser, Philip S Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack D ParsonsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Clare R CockerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alison K EastDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2386-0658
Rachel M WheatleyDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Vinoy K RamachandranDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Farnusch KaschaniDepartment of Chemical Biology, ZMB, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Markus KaiserDepartment of Chemical Biology, ZMB, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philip S PooleDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-6455

Funding

UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/N003608/1UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/N013387/1UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/L501530/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizobial attachment to host legume roots is the first physical interaction of bacteria and plants in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The pH-dependent primary attachment of IMPORTANCE: The first step by which bacteria interact with plant roots is by attachment. In this study, we use a combination of insertion sequencing and biochemical analysis to determine how bacteria attach to pea roots and how this is influenced by pH. We identify several key adhesins, which are molecules that enable bacteria to stick to roots. This includes a novel filamentous hemagglutinin which is needed at all pHs for attachment. Overall, 115 proteins are required for attachment at one or more pHs.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsPisum sativumPlant RootsRhizobium leguminosarumBacterial AdhesionHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSymbiosisBacterial Proteinsadhesinattachmentlegumepearhizobiumroot

Identifiers

PMID39166858
PMCPMC11406972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.