Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166857›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Comparative Effectiveness of Licensed Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-related Medical Encounters and Hospitalizations in the 2022-2023 Influenza Season Among Adults ≥65 Years of Age.

Jennifer H Ku, Emily Rayens, Lina S Sy, Lei Qian, Bradley K Ackerson, Yi Luo, Julia E Tubert, Gina S Lee, Punam P Modha, Yoonyoung Park and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer H KuDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9469-5875
Emily RayensDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3369-3475
Lina S SyDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Lei QianDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Bradley K AckersonDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Yi LuoDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Julia E TubertDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Gina S LeeDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Punam P ModhaDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
Yoonyoung ParkModerna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tianyu SunModerna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Evan J AndersonModerna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Hung Fu TsengDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.

Funding

Moderna, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza causes substantial morbidity, particularly among older individuals. Updated data on the effectiveness of currently licensed vaccines in this population are needed.

methodsAt Kaiser Permanente Southern California, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate comparative vaccine effectiveness (cVE) of high-dose (HD), adjuvanted, and standard-dose (SD) cell-based influenza vaccines, relative to the SD egg-based vaccine. We included adults aged ≥65 years who received an influenza vaccine between 1 August 2022 and 31 December 2022, with follow-up up to 20 May 2023. Primary outcomes were: (1) influenza-related medical encounters and (2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed influenza-related hospitalization. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). cVE (%) was calculated as (1-aHR) × 100 when aHR ≤1, and ([1/aHR]-1) × 100 when aHR >1.

resultsOur study population (n = 495 119) was 54.9% female, 46.3% non-Hispanic White, with a median age of 73 years (interquartile range [IQR] 69-79). Characteristics of all groups were well balanced after IPTW. Adjusted cVEs against influenza-related medical encounters in the HD, adjuvanted, and SD cell-based vaccine groups were 9.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: .9, 16.7), 16.9% (95% CI: 1.7, 29.8), and -6.3 (95% CI: -18.3, 6.9), respectively. Adjusted cVEs against PCR-confirmed hospitalization in the HD, adjuvanted, and SD cell-based groups were 25.1% (95% CI: .2, 43.8), 61.6% (95% CI: 18.1, 82.0), and 26.4% (95% CI: -18.3, 55.7), respectively.

conclusionsCompared to the SD egg-based vaccine, HD and adjuvanted vaccines conferred additional protection against influenza-related outcomes in the 2022-2023 season in adults ≥65 years. Our results provide real-world evidence of the comparative effectiveness of currently licensed vaccines.

Indexed as

HospitalizationInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccine EfficacyAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeasonsVaccinationInfluenza Vaccinesepidemiologyinfluenzainfluenza-related medical encountersinfluenza vaccinevaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID39166857
PMCPMC11581696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.