Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166831›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Integrating adult occurrence and reproduction data to identify conservation measures for amphibians.

Elia Lo Parrino, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Michel Devin, Raoul Manenti, Mattia Falaschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differences in estimates of extinction risk between occupancy and abundance data.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Integrating adult occurrence and reproduction data to identify conservation measures for amphibians.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elia Lo ParrinoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-9568
Gentile Francesco FicetolaDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-5155
Michel DevinDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Raoul ManentiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6071-8194
Mattia FalaschiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-4816

Funding

European Union-NextGenerationEU, Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.5 'Innovation Ecosystems') MUSA Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring programs are pivotal to establishing sound management. Due to economic, logistic, and time limitations, monitoring programs often overlook differences among life-history stages. However, species occurrence does not necessarily mean population viability, and it is unclear to what extent monitoring programs that do not consider separately adult presence and reproduction provide effective management indications. Unfortunately, collecting data on certain life stages requires high sampling effort, leading to a trade-off between model reliability and resources needed for monitoring. We collected data on presence and reproduction of amphibians by monitoring 207 waterbodies in Lombardy (northern Italy) in 2017-2022. We then used multistate occupancy models to test whether certain environmental features, namely, pond area, hydroperiod, forest cover, shade, aquatic vegetation, and predators' presence, differentially affected adult occurrence and breeding probabilities of multiple amphibian species. To assess optimal sampling efforts, we modeled the detection probabilities of adults and reproduction across multiple species. Finally, we identified the optimal monitoring strategy under different scenarios of resource availability, comparing adult-only monitoring versus joint assessment of the occurrence of adults and reproduction. In many cases, the main drivers of adult occurrence and reproduction did not coincide because most investigated ecological variables affected one life stage or the other. Forest area, for instance, increased occurrence probabilities of adults of the endemic Rana latastei but showed no effect on their reproduction probabilities. Quantitative estimates of the sampling effort showed that occurrence of adults was easier to spot in 4 out of 7 species. Multicriteria decision analyses showed that when resources were scarce, monitoring adults was the optimal strategy for those 4 species. Conversely, with more resources, monitoring both adults and reproduction emerged as the best strategy for all the considered species. Integrated monitoring of adults and reproduction is essential to comprehensively identify effective conservation measures for amphibians.

Indexed as

AmphibiansConservation of Natural ResourcesReproductionAnimalsItalyamphibian occurrencebreeding successdetection probabilityéxito reproductivomodelos de ocupación multiestadomonitoreo de faunamultistate occupancy modelspresencia de anfibiosprobabilidad de detecciónwildlife monitoring两栖动物出现数据多状态占域模型检测概率繁殖成功率野生动物监测

Identifiers

PMID39166831
PMCPMC11780209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.