Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166672›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2024

Respiratory muscle strength in stroke: a case-control study.

Abdurrahim Yildiz, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Ayse Nur Bardak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdurrahim YildizSakarya University of Applied Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-0705
Rustem MustafaogluIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-0787
Ayse Nur BardakUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital - İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7800-4982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study was to determine the respiratory muscle strength of stroke patients and compare them with healthy individuals.

methodThe study was conducted with 171 patients who had a stroke between 2017 and 2021 and 32 healthy controls. Respiratory muscle strength and inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressure (MIP and MEP) were measured using the portable MicroRPM device (Micro Medical, Basingstoke, UK).

resultsThe stroke group exhibited significantly lower values in both MIP for men (p<0.001) and women (p=0.013) and maximal expiratory pressure for men (p<0.001) and women (p=0.042), compared with the healthy control group. Notably, there was a significant difference in the MIPmen (p=0.026) and MEPmen (p=0.026) values when comparing the reference values, which were calculated based on age and sex, with those of the healthy group. The baseline values calculated according to age for stroke patients were as follows: MIPmen 31.68%, MIPwomen 63.58%, MEPmen 22.54%, and MEPwomen 42.30%.

conclusionThis study highlights the significant respiratory muscle weakness experienced by stroke patients, with gender-specific differences. It highlights the importance of incorporating respiratory assessments and interventions into stroke rehabilitation protocols to improve the overall health and well-being of stroke patients.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthRespiratory MusclesStrokeAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle WeaknessReference ValuesSex FactorsStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39166672
PMCPMC11329255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.