ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Impact of Reclassification of Oncocytic and Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma by the 2022 WHO Classification.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between histopathological findings and RAI in non-papillary follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary treatment of follicular thyroid carcinoma with hepatic and pulmonary metastases: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Carbonic Anhydrase 12 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for High-Risk Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma.Cancer science · 2026Article
- [Update on follicular thyroid cancer-What is relevant for surgeons?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Impact of Reclassification of Oncocytic and Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma by the 2022 WHO Classification.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2022 WHO Classification categorizes oncocytic (OTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), based on the degree of capsular and vascular invasion, into minimally invasive (MI), encapsulated angio-invasive (EA), and widely invasive tumors (WI). While associations with clinical outcomes have been studied extensively in FTC, robust clinical data are lacking for OTC. We aimed to investigate the impact of the reclassification of OTC and FTC by the 2022 WHO Classification on clinical outcomes.
methodsAll adult OTC and FTC patients treated at the Erasmus MC (the Netherlands) between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively included. All tumors were extensively revised by 2 independent pathologists, facilitated by Palga: Dutch Pathology Databank. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to study the association of the 2004 and 2022 WHO Classification with overall survival, disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival, and radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory disease.
resultsAmong 52 OTC and 89 FTC patients, 15 (28.8%) OTC and 34 (38.2%) FTC tumors were reclassified as EAOTC or EAFTC. The 2022 WHO Classification substantially improved risk stratification in both subtypes for DSS, compared to the 2004 edition. Ten-year DSS rates were 100% for MIOTC, 92.9% for EAOTC, and 56.5% for WIOTC, compared to 100% (MIOTC) and 64.2% (WIOTC) following the 2004 WHO Classification. For FTC and RAI-refractory disease, similar trends were observed.
conclusionClassification of OTC and FTC into 3 subcategories as defined by the 2022 WHO Classification substantially improves discrimination between low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, especially for DSS and RAI-refractory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.