Trial reportMovement disorders clinical practice2024
Exploring Responsiveness to Highly Challenging Balance and Gait Training in Parkinson's Disease.
Trial report in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline predictors of response to a group-based speech and communication intervention in Parkinson's disease: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Trial
- Three-Week Video- and Home-Based Training Program for People with Ataxia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Trial
- Sedentary behavior modifies the effect of balance rehabilitation on balance discordance in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Characteristics of responders to interventions for Parkinson disease: a scoping systematic review.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise potentially improves gait, balance, and habitual physical activity in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, given the heterogeneous nature of the disease, it is likely that people respond differently to exercise interventions. Factors determining responsiveness to exercise interventions remain unclear.
objectivesTo address this uncertainty, we explored the responsiveness to our highly challenging balance and gait intervention (HiBalance) in people with PD.
methodsThirty-nine participants with mild-moderate PD who underwent the HiBalance intervention from our randomized controlled trial were included. We defined response in three domains: (1) balance based on Mini-BESTest, (2) gait based on gait velocity, and (3) physical activity based on accelerometry-derived steps per day. In each domain, we explored three responsiveness levels: high, low, or non-responders according to the change from pre- to post-intervention. Separate Random Forests for each responder domain classified these responsiveness levels and identified variable importance.
resultsOnly the Random Forest for the balance domain classified all responsiveness levels above the chance level indicated by a Cohen's kappa of "slight" agreement. Variable importance differed among the responsiveness levels. Slow gait velocity indicated high responders in the balance domain but showed low probabilities for low and non-responders. For low and non-responders, fall history or no falls, respectively, were more important.
conclusionsAmong three responder domains and responsiveness levels, we could moderately classify responders in the balance domain, but not for the gait or physical activity domain. This can guide inclusion criteria for balance-targeted, personalized intervention studies in people with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.