ArticleActa medica Philippina2024
Clinical Course of Healthcare Workers Diagnosed as COVID-19 Suspects and Contacts during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 infection can present in various clinical forms. Anosmia has been significantly associated with a positive RT-PCR, but it usually appears after four days and has also been observed among COVID-19 negative patients. Knowledge on the clinical course of COVID-19 can guide decision-making on screening, diagnostic testing, and quarantine/isolation procedures. Objectives: To describe the clinical course of healthcare workers (HCWs) with COVID-19-related exposure, symptoms, differential diagnoses, and time to return to work clearance. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving HCWs diagnosed as COVID-19 contacts/suspects between April 2020 and April 2021. Information on demographics, time elapsed between clinical events, outcomes, and final diagnoses were collected from hospital records. Categorical data was presented in frequencies and percentages, while numerical data were reported as range and median values. Results: There were 4755 consultations for COVID-19-related symptoms or exposure that were included in the study. Symptoms developed at a median of one day post-exposure. Consultation was at two days following symptom onset or four days after exposure. RT-PCR was done on the day of consult. Symptoms resolved after a median of six days. Return to work (RTW) was seven days from consult. Common presenting symptoms were respiratory (56.71%) and systemic (34.04%). COVID-19 was positive in 13.79% of consults. Almost all HCWs recovered (99%) as outpatient (88%). Differential diagnoses were usually other respiratory infections (8.60%) and allergic rhinitis (2.37%). Conclusion: The clinical course for HCWs who consulted for COVID-19-related symptoms or exposure lasted for two weeks from symptom onset or exposure until clearance for work resumption. The most common symptoms were respiratory and systemic in nature. Recovery was noted after six days. The most common alternative diagnoses for COVID-19 negative cases were respiratory infection and allergic rhinitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.