Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166091›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Systematic evaluation and review of Germany renewable energy research: A bibliometric study from 2008 to 2023.

Haiyang He, Huazhong Tu, Hongli Zhang, Shenghong Luo, Zheng Ma, Xinmiao Yang, Yumeng Li, Chunxue Yang, Jianhong Wang, Zhiling Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haiyang HeBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Huazhong TuBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Hongli ZhangBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Shenghong LuoChinese People's Public Security University, Beijing, China.
Zheng MaSchool of International Relations, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Xinmiao YangBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Yumeng LiBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Chunxue YangBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Jianhong WangBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.
Zhiling ZhaoBaize Institute for Strategy Studies, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research purpose: This study aims to outline the fundamental status of the German academic community's research in the field of renewable energy and to foster collaboration between China and Germany in this area. Research methods: This study examines documents published by German scholars from 2008 to 2023, which are part of the "Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection" database and related to renewable energy issues, using the bibliometric visualization tool CiteSpace 6.2.R6. Research conclusions: The study examines the co-occurrence and burst of keywords, changes in publication volume, international collaboration networks, research institution collaboration networks, and researcher collaboration networks. It concluded that: (1) German academic research in the field of renewable energy can be divided into three phases: nascent (2008-2014), surge (2015-2021), and decline (2022-2023). (2) The Helmholtz Association and Reinhard Madlener, among other prominent institutions and academicians, are responsible for the close cooperation among personnel and institutions, the significant leading effect, and the emphasis on cutting-edge topics. Research in this field notably focuses on cutting-edge issues like life cycle assessment and developing countries. The study observes a transition in research concentration from macro to micro perspectives. In the context of a global collective response to climate change, the analysis of the German academic community's overall situation will enhance the collaboration between the two countries in the field of renewable energy research.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisCiteSpaceGermanyNew energyRenewable energyVisualization map

Identifiers

PMID39166091
PMCPMC11334623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.