Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166060›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A data-driven Bayesian network of management and organizational factors for human reliability analysis in the process industry.

Shuo Yang, Micaela Demichela, Jie Geng, Ling Wang, Zhangwei Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuo YangDepartment of Science Application and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Micaela DemichelaDepartment of Science Application and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Jie GengZhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ling WangZhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhangwei LingZhejiang Academy of Special Equipment Science, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to historical statistical data, management and organizational factors (MOFs) contribute more to process accidents than technique factors. Under the umbrella of socio-tech system theory, human reliability analysis (HRA) has become a critical part of systemic probability risk analysis. In many HRA techniques, MOFs are among the performance shaping factors (PSFs). However, the interactions and causality of MOFs to human errors are still difficult to quantify and lack validation. To fill these gaps, a framework is proposed, considering data source selection, CBN construction algorithm comparison, and results validation. The case study employed the open access eMARS database as a data source. The optimized hybrid structure learning algorithm and Bayesian criteria parameter learning algorithm are employed to build a Causal Bayesian Network (CBN) of (MOFs) that lead to human error. The proposed kernel CBN is validated through prediction accuracy and sensitivity analysis. For theoretical contribution, the validated kernel BN could generally serve as the heart part of more specific CBNs as a basis for future works. For practical applications, an application shows the model's ability to quantify the contribution of MOFs to system reliability. The results show that human-machine interacting system reliability is most sensitive to organizational factors such as adequate training and procedures.

Indexed as

Causal Bayesian networkOrganizational factorsProcess safetySocio-technical systems

Identifiers

PMID39166060
PMCPMC11334797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.