Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166054›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A novel deep learning framework for rolling bearing fault diagnosis enhancement using VAE-augmented CNN model.

Yu Wang, Dexiong Li, Lei Li, Runde Sun, Shuqing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China.
Dexiong LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China.
Runde SunDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China.
Shuqing WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shijiazhuang Institute of Railway Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of burgeoning industrial advancement, there is an increasing trend towards the integration of intelligence and precision in mechanical equipment. Central to the functionality of such equipment is the rolling bearing, whose operational integrity significantly impacts the overall performance of the machinery. This underscores the imperative for reliable fault diagnosis mechanisms in the continuous monitoring of rolling bearing conditions within industrial production environments. Vibration signals are primarily used for fault diagnosis in mechanical equipment because they provide comprehensive information about the equipment's condition. However, fault data often contain high noise levels, high-frequency variations, and irregularities, along with a significant amount of redundant information, like duplication, overlap, and unnecessary information during signal transmission. These characteristics present considerable challenges for effective fault feature extraction and diagnosis, reducing the accuracy and reliability of traditional fault detection methods. This research introduces an innovative fault diagnosis methodology for rolling bearings using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) enhanced with variational autoencoders (VAEs). This deep learning approach aims to precisely identify and classify faults by extracting detailed vibration signal features. The VAE enhances noise robustness, while the CNN improves signal data expressiveness, addressing issues like gradient vanishing and explosion. The model employs the reparameterization trick for unsupervised learning of latent features and further trains with the CNN. The system incorporates adaptive threshold methods, the "3/5" strategy, and Dropout methods. The diagnosis accuracy of the VAE-CNN model for different fault types at different rotational speeds typically reaches more than 90 %, and it achieves a generally acceptable diagnosis result. Meanwhile, the VAE-CNN augmented fault diagnosis model, after experimental validation in various dimensions, can achieve more satisfactory diagnosis results for various fault types compared to several representative deep neural network models without VAE augmentation, significantly improving the accuracy and robustness of rolling bearing fault diagnosis.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksDeep learningFault diagnosisRolling bearingVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID39166054
PMCPMC11334817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.