Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166029›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Use of smartphone sensor data in detecting and predicting depression and anxiety in young people (12-25 years): A scoping review.

Joanne R Beames, Jin Han, Artur Shvetcov, Wu Yi Zheng, Aimy Slade, Omar Dabash, Jodie Rosenberg, Bridianne O'Dea, Suranga Kasturi, Leonard Hoon and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joanne R BeamesBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jin HanBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Artur ShvetcovBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wu Yi ZhengBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aimy SladeBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Omar DabashBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jodie RosenbergBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Suranga KasturiBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leonard HoonApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alexis E WhittonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Helen ChristensenUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jill M NewbyBlack Dog Institute and School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital phenotyping is a promising method for advancing scalable detection and prediction methods in mental health research and practice. However, little is known about how digital phenotyping data are used to make inferences about youth mental health. We conducted a scoping review of 35 studies to better understand how passive sensing (e.g., Global Positioning System, microphone etc) and electronic usage data (e.g., social media use, device activity etc) collected via smartphones are used in detecting and predicting depression and/or anxiety in young people between 12 and 25 years-of-age. GPS and/or Wifi association logs and accelerometers were the most used sensors, although a wide variety of low-level features were extracted and computed (e.g., transition frequency, time spent in specific locations, uniformity of movement). Mobility and sociability patterns were explored in more studies compared to other behaviours such as sleep, phone use, and circadian movement. Studies used machine learning, statistical regression, and correlation analyses to examine relationships between variables. Results were mixed, but machine learning indicated that models using feature combinations (e.g., mobility, sociability, and sleep features) were better able to predict and detect symptoms of youth anxiety and/or depression when compared to models using single features (e.g., transition frequency). There was inconsistent reporting of age, gender, attrition, and phone characteristics (e.g., operating system, models), and all studies were assessed to have moderate to high risk of bias. To increase translation potential for clinical practice, we recommend the development of a standardised reporting framework to improve transparency and replicability of methodology.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionMachine learningPhoneSensingYouth

Identifiers

PMID39166029
PMCPMC11334877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.