ArticleHeliyon2024
Use of smartphone sensor data in detecting and predicting depression and anxiety in young people (12-25 years): A scoping review.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multilevel meta-analysis of passive smartphone sensing of adolescent mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Smartphone-Based Digital Phenotyping Across Health Conditions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Monitoring and evaluation of digital mental health assessments in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability and concurrent mental illness: a pilot study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Digital phenotyping of affect and stress in emerging adults.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as decision support for adolescent depression and anxiety: a mini review of clinical utility, safety, and implementation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- H3-MOSAIC: multimodal generative AI for semantic place detection from high-frequency GPS on H3 grids in mental health geomatics.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
- Testing the feasibility of passive sensing among adolescents: Implications for mental health.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Cross-Platform Availability of Smartphone Sensors for Depression Indication Systems: Mixed-Methods Umbrella Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- The daily phone diary in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida: utility and psychometric evidence.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Collecting and Linking Digital Phenotyping, Clinical, and Genetics Data for Mental Health Research: Pilot Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- Recent Progress in Biosensors for Depression Monitoring-Advancing Personalized Treatment.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital phenotyping is a promising method for advancing scalable detection and prediction methods in mental health research and practice. However, little is known about how digital phenotyping data are used to make inferences about youth mental health. We conducted a scoping review of 35 studies to better understand how passive sensing (e.g., Global Positioning System, microphone etc) and electronic usage data (e.g., social media use, device activity etc) collected via smartphones are used in detecting and predicting depression and/or anxiety in young people between 12 and 25 years-of-age. GPS and/or Wifi association logs and accelerometers were the most used sensors, although a wide variety of low-level features were extracted and computed (e.g., transition frequency, time spent in specific locations, uniformity of movement). Mobility and sociability patterns were explored in more studies compared to other behaviours such as sleep, phone use, and circadian movement. Studies used machine learning, statistical regression, and correlation analyses to examine relationships between variables. Results were mixed, but machine learning indicated that models using feature combinations (e.g., mobility, sociability, and sleep features) were better able to predict and detect symptoms of youth anxiety and/or depression when compared to models using single features (e.g., transition frequency). There was inconsistent reporting of age, gender, attrition, and phone characteristics (e.g., operating system, models), and all studies were assessed to have moderate to high risk of bias. To increase translation potential for clinical practice, we recommend the development of a standardised reporting framework to improve transparency and replicability of methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.