Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165988›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

How can rural digitalization improve agricultural green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from counties in China.

Shen Lu, Jincai Zhuang, Zenan Sun, Man Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shen LuSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China.
Jincai ZhuangSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China.
Zenan SunSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China.
Man HuangSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of escalating environmental pollution and resource depletion induced by traditional agricultural industry development, the imperative for agricultural efficiency and ecologically friendly practices has become pivotal for global agricultural sustainability. In the digital era, rural digitalization has substantially amplified agricultural production efficiency while notably reducing environmental pollution. This study is based on panel data from 1602 counties in China spanning from 2011 to 2020, measuring the levels of rural digitalization and agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP) across these counties, empirically examining their dynamic correlation. The research findings reveal: (1) A significant enhancement of AGTFP with the elevation of rural digitalization; for every 1 % increase in rural digitalization, AGTFP increases by 1.78 %. Robustness checks, including instrumental variables and quasi-natural experiments, affirm the validity of these conclusions. Furthermore, by comparing regional differences in China, it can be observed that the impact of rural digitalization on AGTFP varies across different areas: in the eastern, central, and western regions, for every 1 % increase in rural digitalization, the AGTFP increases by 2.65 %, 1.53 %, and 0.82 %, respectively. (2) Rural digitalization fosters an increase in AGTFP by stimulating rural entrepreneurial activity, with the mediation effect of rural entrepreneurial activity accounting for 3.34 % of the total effect. (3) Utilizing a threshold model, observations indicate that when rural digitalization surpasses the first threshold of 0.3200, the AGTFP coefficient escalates from 0.0462 to 0.7519. However, when rural digitalization exceeds the second threshold of 0.7118, this coefficient declines to 0.2429, signifying a nonlinear trend in the marginal effect of rural digitalization on AGTFP-initial enhancement followed by attenuation. (4) In the spatial model analysis, the study confirms spatial spillover effects of rural digitalization on AGTFP, indicating variations in spatial effects among different matrices. However, the indirect effects of rural digitalization on AGTFP, mainly influenced by the neighboring counties' digitalization levels, contribute more significantly than the direct effects. Based on these conclusions, this paper proposes augmenting investments in rural digitalization, implementing diversified rural digitalization schemes, invigorating rural entrepreneurial activity, and harmonizing regional digital development as novel approaches to enhance AGTFP, thereby fostering rural economic development.

Indexed as

AGTFPRural digitalizationSpatial spillover effectsThreshold effectsTransmission mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID39165988
PMCPMC11334796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.