ArticleClinical interventions in aging2024
Impact of the Home-Based Medical Integrated Program on Health Outcomes and Medical Resource Utilization in Home Healthcare Patients in Taiwan.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Care at Home: A Novel Home-Based Medical Care Program for Community-Dwelling Frail Older Adults in Hong Kong.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2025Observational
- Hospital-at-Home in Taiwan: Reducing Hospital Stay and Medical Expenditures.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The home-based medical integrated program (HMIP) is a novel model for home healthcare (HHC) in Taiwan, initiated in 2016 to enhance care quality. However, the outcomes of this program on health outcomes and medical resource utilization in HHC patients remain unclear. Thus, we conducted this study to clarify it. Patients and Methods: The authors utilized the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to identify HHC patients who received HMIP and those who did not between January 2015 and December 2017. A retrospective cohort study design was used. Convenience sampling was employed to select patients who met the inclusion criteria: being part of the HHC program and having complete data for analysis. Results: A total of 4982 HHC patients in the HMIP group and 10,447 patients in the non-HMIP group were identified for this study. The mean age in the HMIP group and non-HMIP group was 77.6 years and 76.1 years, respectively. Compared with the non-HMIP group, the HMIP group had lower total medical costs for HHC, fewer outpatient department visits and lower medical costs, lower medical costs for emergency department visits, fewer hospitalizations, and a lower mortality rate (34.6% vs 41.2%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The HMIP is a promising model for improving care quality and reducing medical resource utilization in HHC patients. While this suggests that the non-HMIP model should be replaced, it's important to note that both non-HMIP and HMIP models currently coexist. The HMIP may serve as an important reference for other nations seeking to improve care quality and reduce medical resource utilization in their own HHC systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.