ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2024
Evaluation of the relationship between the presence of an accessory maxillary ostium and the presence and types of nasal septum deviation: A computed tomography study.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe maxillary accessory ostium (AMO) has been associated with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal septal deviation (NSD), but AMO may also be present in healthy individuals. AMO's purpose, origin, and effects are uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the types and frequency of AMO and NSD, as well as their relationship.
methodsIn our retrospective, single-center study, paranasal sinus tomographs performed in our clinic between 2022 and 2023 were scanned, and 200 patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated in terms of AMO direction (right/left), accessory ostium location (superior/middle/inferior 1/3), presence of NSD, and deviation type according to the Mladina index.
results60.5% of the patients were female and 39.5% were male. AMO distribution was similar between the groups (p>0.05). There was no significant correlation between the presence and localization of AMO and the presence of NSD (p>0.05). NSD was detected in 93 patients (89.4%) with AMO and 78 patients (81.3%) without AMO (p=0.16). The distribution of NSD presence and types was similar in right or left localization, AMO (+) and AMO (-) patients (p>0.05).
conclusionThe evidence that AMOs cause chronic sinusitis and FESS failure is insufficient and cannot explain the presence of AMOs in healthy individuals or children. There are very few studies in the literature examining the NSD-AMO relationship. In our study, high rates of NSD and AMO were found in individuals without paranasal disease, but no statistically significant relationship was found between the presence, location, and type of NSD and AMO. Early-onset, long-term prospective studies on the relationship between NSD and AMO may help to explain the etiopathogenesis of paranasal diseases that reduce quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.