ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2024
Evaluation of the results of tongue reconstruction using local flaps following partial glossectomy.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional outcomes in early-stage tongue cancer patients following partial glossectomy: a pilot study comparing primary closure and secondary healing with biomaterials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The use of a novel PLA resorbable membrane to reconstruct lateral tongue defects - a pilot report.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTongue reconstruction results following partial glossectomy using primary closure and local tissue rearrangement were evaluated in this study.
methods7 patients diagnosed with tongue carcinoma were included. Tongue defects were reconstructed using local transposition, advancement and rotation of the remaining tongue tissue and closure of the defect. The patients were evaluated 6 months and 1 year following the surgery.
resultsNone of the patients had permanent speech impairments or major swallowing problems following the surgery despite 33% to 50% reduction in tongue length.
conclusionUnnecessary utilization of microvascular flaps for partial tongue reconstruction should be avoided in partial glossectomy patients in which reduction in tongue length is below 50%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.