ArticleMatter2024
Biophysical characterization of synthetic adhesins for predicting and tuning engineered living material properties.
Article in Matter, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo Autogenic Engineered Living Functional Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- A programmable living force sensor fabricated with surface engineered microbial network.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From biological surfaces to engineered systems: how synthetic and systems biology enable biomimetic design.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Programming cellular condensates for living materials using an intrinsically disordered protein display platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Chromosome level assemblies of Nakaseomyces (Candida) bracarensis uncover two distinct clades and define its adhesin repertoire.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial synthetic multicellular systems are promising platforms for engineered living materials (ELMs) for medical, biosynthesis, environmental, and smart materials applications. Recent advancements in genetically encoded adhesion toolkits have enabled precise manipulation of cell-cell adhesion and the design and patterning of self-assembled multicellular materials. However, in contrast to gene regulation in synthetic biology, the characterization and control of synthetic adhesins remains limited. Here, we demonstrate the quantitative characterization of a bacterial synthetic adhesion toolbox through various biophysical methods. We determine key parameters, including number of adhesins per cell, in-membrane diffusion constant, production and decay rates, and bond-breaking force between adhesins. With these parameters, we demonstrate the bottom-up prediction and quantitative tuning of macroscopic ELM properties (tensile strength) and, furthermore, that cells inside ELMs are connected only by a small fraction of available adhesins. These results enable the rational engineering, characterization, and modeling of other synthetic and natural adhesins and multicellular consortia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.