Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165646›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2024

Intraoperative pyloric drainage is unnecessary during esophagectomies: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Armand Csontos, Dávid Németh, Lajos Szakó, Gergő Berke, Dóra Lili Sindler, Dávid Berki, Csenge Papp, Péter Hegyi, András Vereczkei, András Papp

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Armand CsontosDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dávid NémethInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Lajos SzakóInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Gergő BerkeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dóra Lili SindlerDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dávid BerkiFirst Department of Surgery, Military Hospital Medical Centre, Hungarian Defense Forces, Budapest, Hungary.
Csenge PappDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
András VereczkeiDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
András PappDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DrainageEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansPylorusesophageal canceresophageal surgeryesophagectomyminimal invasivepyloroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39165646
PMCPMC11333203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.