ArticleCureus2024
Identifying Work-Related Injuries Among Healthcare Workers in Makkah Hospitals, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study in 2024.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Injuries Among Hospital Workers: A Retrospective Study in Turkey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Saudi Radiology Technologists' Perception of Occupational Hazards from a Personal and Social Lens.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Work-related injuries (WRIs) are a major occupational health issue among healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide. HCWs face numerous daily hazards including needlestick injuries, chemical exposures, ergonomic strains, and psychological stressors crucial for their health and healthcare system functionality. In Makkah, Saudi Arabia, healthcare infrastructure advances raise concerns about work-related injuries among HCWs. This study in Makkah hospitals aims to identify, understand, and manage WRIs for improved occupational health guidelines and strategies. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study on HCWs was conducted at Makkah hospitals using an electronic questionnaire that investigated the demographics, work-related injuries, and occupational hazards. The data collected from the retrieved questionnaires were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results Among 379 enrolled HCWs, 172 (49.3%) were physicians and 89 (19.8%) were nurses; 304 (80.2%) of the total participants knew about occupational safety. The total incidence of WRIs was 67.8%. WRIs were significantly associated with age (P˂0.001), gender (P=0.02), educational level (P˂0.001), profession (P˂0.001), working hours (P˂0.001), and shift time (P˂0.001). Conclusion WRIs were highly prevalent among HCWs with varying rates based on the type of injury and the frequency of injury. WRIs were associated with various factors including age, gender, education, profession, working house, and shift time of the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.