Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165613›Full record

ReviewDrugs in context2024

Sublingually administered bacterial lysates: rationale, mechanisms of action and clinical outcomes.

Fulvio Braido, Giovanni Melioli, Gabriele Nicolini, Melissa Ferraris, Stefano Di Girolamo, Mario Di Gioacchino, Giorgio Walter Canonica

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in context, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fulvio BraidoIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Italy.
Giovanni MelioliAlliance Medical Diagnostic, Genova, Italy.
Gabriele NicoliniBruschettini srl, Genova, Italy.
Melissa FerrarisUniversità di Genova, DiMI, Genoa, Italy.
Stefano Di GirolamoOtorhinolaryngology Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata School of Medicine and Surgery, Rome, Italy.
Mario Di GioacchinoCenter for Advanced Studies and Technology, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
Giorgio Walter CanonicaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses available evidence on the mechanisms of action of bacterial lysates, and the clinical effects of their sublingual administration. Bacterial lysates act through many immunological effects, including dendritic cell activation, modification of circulating lymphocyte subsets and antibody production. The production of salivary IgA was repeatedly shown to be induced by the sublingual administration of a prototype bacterial lysate containing soluble and corpuscular antigens. Bacterial lysates are a useful tool for the prevention of recurrent respiratory tract infections. Sublingual administration should be the preferred option.

Indexed as

bacterial lysateimmunological mechanismssublingual administration

Identifiers

PMID39165613
PMCPMC11335356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.