Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165437›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Class II Correction and Crowding Treatment Using In-House Direct Printed Clear Aligners: A Literature Review and Case Report.

Hoang Viet, Tran Hung Lam, Nguyen Ngoc Phuc, Nguyen Ngoc Lenh, Dang Thi Nhu Thao

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hoang VietOrthodontics, Sai Gon Dental Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.
Tran Hung LamProsthodontics, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.
Nguyen Ngoc PhucPeriodontology and Implantology, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.
Nguyen Ngoc LenhOrthodontics, Private Laboratory, Sai Gon Dental Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.
Dang Thi Nhu ThaoOrthodontics and Pedodontics, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh, VNM.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear aligner therapy has significantly improved orthodontic treatment by offering patients a more aesthetically pleasing option compared to traditional braces. This literature review and case report specifically focus on the effectiveness of directly printed clear aligners in treating Class II malocclusions and crowding. Class II malocclusions are characterized by excessive overjet, which often results from skeletal or dental discrepancies between the upper and lower jaws. Crowding refers to the lack of space for teeth within the dental arch, leading to misalignment and potential functional issues. The review and case report highlight the increasing importance of directly printed clear aligners in modern orthodontics and provide clinicians with a valuable tool to effectively address complex malocclusions and crowding while also meeting patient needs for discretion and comfort. Further research is necessary to validate the long-term stability and outcomes of directly printed clear aligner therapy in various orthodontic cases. A detailed case report demonstrates the successful treatment of a patient with Class II malocclusion and mild crowding using directly printed clear aligners. Treatment outcomes include improvements in dental alignment, occlusion, and facial aesthetics, showcasing the effectiveness of this innovative approach.

Indexed as

class ii malocclusionclear alignerdigital orthodonticsdirect printed clear alignerorthodontic crowding

Identifiers

PMID39165437
PMCPMC11333988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.