Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165299›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2024

Serial tissue expansion and excision for reconstruction of giant dorsal congenital melanocytic nevus: A case report.

Hong Phuc Le, Nhat Tien Tran, Bao Song Nguyen Tran, Nghi Thanh Nhan Le

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hong Phuc LeDepartment of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam.
Nhat Tien TranDepartment of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4230-6772
Bao Song Nguyen TranDepartment of Histology, Embryology, Pathology and Forensic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam.
Nghi Thanh Nhan LeDepartment of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant congenital melanocytic nevus often necessitates meticulous planning and multiple treatment stages for complete surgical excision. This report presents a case of giant congenital melanocytic nevus on the back managed through serial tissue expansion and excision. Initially, two expanders were placed at the deep fascia level. Sequential outpatient expansions over 10 weeks were followed by expander removal, partial nevus excision, defect coverage with expanded skin flaps, and simultaneous placement of a new expander. The subsequent single expander expansion over 12 weeks involved a total of 600 mL of saline. After three operations spanning approximately 6 months, 54 cm × 36 cm of giant congenital melanocytic nevus skin, covering 65% of the patient's back, was completely excised. Serial tissue expansion and excision may be an effective surgical approach for managing dorsal giant congenital melanocytic nevus, reducing the need for multiple surgeries and achieving favorable aesthetic outcomes.

Indexed as

Giant dorsal melanocytic nevusserial excisionserial tissue expansion

Identifiers

PMID39165299
PMCPMC11334130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.