ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2025
The Role of Matrix Stiffness and Viscosity on Lipid Phenotype and Fat Lineage Potential.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous fat transfer is a common procedure that patients undergo to rejuvenate large soft tissue defects. However, these surgeries are complicated by limited tissue sources, donor-site morbidity, and necrosis. While the biofabrication of fat tissue can serve as a clinical option for reconstructive surgery, the influence of matrix mechanics, specifically stiffness and viscosity, on adipogenesis requires further elucidation. Additionally, the effects of these mechanical parameters on metabolic and thermogenic fat potential have yet to be investigated. In this study, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) polymers with varying degrees of methacrylation (DoM) were fabricated to create matrices with different stiffnesses and viscosities. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells were then encapsulated in mechanically tunable GelMA and underwent adipogenesis to investigate the effects of matrix mechanics on lipid phenotype and fat potential. Mechanical testing confirmed that GelMA stiffness was regulated by DoM and weight composition, whereas viscosity was determined by the latter. Further work revealed that while lipid phenotype became more enriched as matrix stiffness and viscosity declined, the potential toward metabolic and thermogenic fat appeared to be more viscous dependent rather than stiffness dependent. In addition, fatty acid binding protein 4 and uncoupling protein 1 gene expression exhibited viscous-dependent behavior despite comparable levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. However, despite the superior role of viscosity, lipid quantity and mitochondrial abundance demonstrated stiffness-dependent behavior. Overall, this work revealed that matrix viscosity played a more superior role than stiffness in driving adipogenesis and distinguishing between metabolic and thermogenic fat potential. Ultimately, this differentiation in fat production is important for engineering ideal adipose tissue for large soft tissue defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.