ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2024
Performance evaluation of a low-throughput qPCR-based Legionella assay for utility as an onsite industrial water system monitoring method.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legionella is a bacterial genus found in natural aquatic environments, as well as domestic and industrial water systems. Legionella presents potential human health risks when aerosolized and inhaled by at-risk individuals and is commonly monitored at locations with likelihood of proliferation and human exposure. Legionella monitoring is widely performed using culture-based testing, which faces limitations including turnaround time and interferences. Molecular biology methodologies, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), are being explored to supplement or replace culture-based testing because of faster turnaround and lower detection limits, allowing for more rapid water remediation measures. In this study, three methods were compared by testing industrial water samples: culture-based testing by a certified lab, high throughput qPCR testing (HT qPCR), and field deployable low throughput qPCR testing (LT qPCR). The qPCR test methods reported more positive results than culture testing, indicating improved sensitivity and specificity. The LT qPCR test is portable with quick turnaround times, and can be leveraged for environmental surveillance, process optimization, monitoring, and onsite case investigations. The LT qPCR test had high negative predictive value and would be a useful tool for negative screening of Legionella samples from high-risk environments and/or outbreak investigations to streamline samples for culture testing. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: This study compared three test methods for Legionella to evaluate performance of a low throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction (LT qPCR) test for Legionella that can be used onsite; the study found that the high throughput (HT) and LT qPCR tests used in this study gave more positive results than culture testing, and the results indicated a similar negative predictive value for the HT and LT qPCR tests, supporting that the LT qPCR method could be useful for negative screening of Legionella samples in industrial water systems onsite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.