Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165113›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral implants research2024

Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study.

Lisetta Lam, Saso Ivanovski, Ryan S B Lee

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral implants research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Application progress of collagen membranes in oral medicine].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisetta LamSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-6716
Saso IvanovskiSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5339-0936
Ryan S B LeeSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-4799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effects of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) on ridge height, sinus pneumatization and the potential need for lateral sinus augmentation following extraction in the posterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized controlled pilot study included 28 patients requiring extraction in the posterior maxilla with bone height between 6 and 8 mm. The sites were randomly allocated to either unassisted socket healing (Control), ARP with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Test 1), or collagen-stabilized DBBM (Test 2) groups. Pre- and post-operative CTs at 4 months were taken to determine changes in ridge heights, sinus volume, and the need for sinus floor elevation (SFE) procedures for cases where the residual mid-ridge height was < 5 mm. Site-level analyses for changes in vertical ridge dimensions and sinus volume pre- and post-extraction/ARP were conducted using paired t-tests. Differences in mean changes in vertical ridge dimensions and sinus volume between the groups were determined using one-way ANOVA.

resultsSignificantly greater mean mid-ridge height reduction occurred in the control group (-2.7 ± 0.9 mm) compared to Test 1 (0.9 ± 3.7 mm) and Test 2 (1.0 ± 2.8 mm) groups (p < .05). No significant changes in mean mid-ridge height were found in either test groups. Volumetric analysis showed a significantly greater increase in sinus volume in the control group (0.7 ± 0.7 cm

conclusionARP was effective in attenuating height changes in the middle of the ridge and may reduce sinus pneumatization following extraction in the posterior maxilla. This could potentially decrease the need for more invasive sinus augmentation procedures.

Indexed as

MaxillaSinus Floor AugmentationTooth ExtractionAdultAgedAlveolar ProcessAlveolar Ridge AugmentationBone SubstitutesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBone Substitutesalveolar ridge preservationalveolar ridge resorptionBio‐OssBio‐Oss collagenextractionmaxillary sinus augmentationmaxillary sinus pneumatizationsocket grafting

Identifiers

PMID39165113
PMCPMC11629457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.