Trial reportClinical oral implants research2024
Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study.
Trial report in Clinical oral implants research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The clinical benefit of alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Trial
- Article
- Impact of Bone Particle Size on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Molar Extraction Sites.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Immediate vs. Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Procedures with Xeno-Hybrid Bovine Bone Graft: A Retrospective Cohort with Operator-Level Comparison.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of maxillary sinus augmentation in atrophied posterior maxilla based on residual bone height.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- [Application progress of collagen membranes in oral medicine].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- Topographic Analysis of Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus in the Mongolian Population.Cureus · 2025Article
- Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effects of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) on ridge height, sinus pneumatization and the potential need for lateral sinus augmentation following extraction in the posterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled pilot study included 28 patients requiring extraction in the posterior maxilla with bone height between 6 and 8 mm. The sites were randomly allocated to either unassisted socket healing (Control), ARP with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Test 1), or collagen-stabilized DBBM (Test 2) groups. Pre- and post-operative CTs at 4 months were taken to determine changes in ridge heights, sinus volume, and the need for sinus floor elevation (SFE) procedures for cases where the residual mid-ridge height was < 5 mm. Site-level analyses for changes in vertical ridge dimensions and sinus volume pre- and post-extraction/ARP were conducted using paired t-tests. Differences in mean changes in vertical ridge dimensions and sinus volume between the groups were determined using one-way ANOVA.
resultsSignificantly greater mean mid-ridge height reduction occurred in the control group (-2.7 ± 0.9 mm) compared to Test 1 (0.9 ± 3.7 mm) and Test 2 (1.0 ± 2.8 mm) groups (p < .05). No significant changes in mean mid-ridge height were found in either test groups. Volumetric analysis showed a significantly greater increase in sinus volume in the control group (0.7 ± 0.7 cm
conclusionARP was effective in attenuating height changes in the middle of the ridge and may reduce sinus pneumatization following extraction in the posterior maxilla. This could potentially decrease the need for more invasive sinus augmentation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.