Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165097›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Application of telemetry-based fish habitat models to predict spatial habitat availability and inform ecological restoration.

Sarah M Larocque, Paul A Bzonek, Jacob W Brownscombe, Gillian K Martin, Jill L Brooks, Christine M Boston, Susan E Doka, Steven J Cooke, Jonathan D Midwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah M LarocqueFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-4988
Paul A BzonekFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Jacob W BrownscombeFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Gillian K MartinFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Jill L BrooksFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Christine M BostonFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E DokaFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Steven J CookeFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan D MidwoodFisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Science, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

ECCC GLAPGreat Lakes Fishery Commission 2013_BIN_44024Great Lakes Restoration Initiative GL-00E23010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation decisions surrounding which fish habitats managers choose to protect and restore are informed by fish habitat models. As acoustic telemetry has allowed for improvements in our ability to directly measure fish positions year-round, so too have there been opportunities to refine and apply fish habitat models. In an area with considerable anthropogenic disturbance, Hamilton Harbour in the Laurentian Great Lakes, we used telemetry-based fish habitat models to identify key habitat variables, compare habitat associations among seasons, and spatially identify the presence distribution of six fish species. Using environmental data and telemetry-based presence-absence from 2016 to 2022, random forest models were developed for each species across seasons. Habitat variables with the highest relative importance across species included fetch, water depth, and percentage cover of submerged aquatic vegetation. The presence probability of each species was spatially predicted for each season within Hamilton Harbour. Generally, species showed a spatial range expansion with greater presence probability in the fall and winter to include parts of the harbor further offshore, and a range contraction in the spring and summer toward the nearshore, sheltered areas, with summer having the most limited habitat availability. Greater habitat suitability was predicted in western Hamilton Harbour for the majority of species, whereas the east end was less suitable and may benefit from habitat restoration. These types of fish habitat models are highly flexible and can be used with a variety of data, not just telemetry, and should be considered as an additional tool for fish habitat and fisheries managers alike.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFishesTelemetryAnimalsSeasonsacoustic telemetryenvironmental relationshabitat suitabilitymachine learningspace use

Identifiers

PMID39165097
PMCPMC12120343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.