ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2024
Nanostructured Surfaces Enhance Nucleation Rate of Calcium Carbonate.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanostructured Surfaces Enhance Nucleation Rate of Calcium Carbonate.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleation and growth of calcium carbonate on surfaces is of broad importance in nature and technology, being essential to the calcification of organisms, while negatively impacting energy conversion through crystallization fouling, also called scale formation. Previous work studied how confinements, surface energies, and functionalizations affect nucleation and polymorph formation, with surface-water interactions and ion mobility playing important roles. However, the influence of surface nanostructures with nanocurvature-through pit and bump morphologies-on scale formation is unknown, limiting the development of scalephobic surfaces. Here, it is shown that nanoengineered surfaces enhance the nucleation rate by orders of magnitude, despite expected inhibition through effects like induced lattice strain through surface nanocurvature. Interfacial and holographic microscopy is used to quantify crystallite growth and find that nanoengineered interfaces experience slower individual growth rates while collectively the surface has 18% more deposited mass. Reconstructions through nanoscale cross-section imaging of surfaces coupled with classical nucleation theory-utilizing local nanocurvature effects-show the collective enhancement of nano-pits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.