ReviewExpert opinion on pharmacotherapy2024
Pharmacotherapy for cervical cancer: current standard of care and new perspectives.
Review in Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04221945 (A Randomized, Phase 3, Double-Blind Study of Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of High-risk, Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double-Blind Study of Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of High-risk, Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (KEYNOTE-A18/ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of results from KEYNOTE-826 and its impact within the East Asian population with real-world applications.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing: Promising Therapeutics for HPV-driven Cervical Cancer.Current drug targets · 2026Article
- Adverse drug reaction assessment of pembrolizumab in cervical cancer treatment: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer, while highly preventable, remains an international public health challenge especially in under resourced regions. Although early-stage cervix confined cancers are often amenable to surgical resection, larger tumors deemed locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) necessitate systemic therapy as part of chemoradiation therapy. Moreover, systemic therapy is the standard therapeutic approach for those presenting with primary metastasis or recurrence. AREAS COVERED: While several agents have been approved to treat recurrent cervical cancer including checkpoint inhibitors as well as both biomarker agnostic and specific antibody drug conjugates, the development of agents added to chemoradiation has been less fruitful. Until recently, the addition of novel therapies to chemoradiation has been negative in terms of improving outcomes; however, results of a recent Phase III clinical trial (NCT04221945) in LACC demonstrated that the addition of pembrolizumab to standard of care chemoradiation was associated with an improvement in progression-free survival and resulted in an FDA approval for this therapy. This observation led to the first change in treating LACC since the early 2000s. EXPERT OPINION: Improvements in systemic therapy both alone and in combination with chemoradiation for cervical cancer have been realized. Ongoing research is needed for therapeutic options following immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.