Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164790›Full record

ReviewBioelectronic medicine2024

The rise of bioelectronic medicine.

Dimitrios A Koutsouras, George G Malliaras, Geert Langereis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural Interfaces for Bioelectronic Medicine.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitrios A KoutsourasIMEC NL, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. dimitrios.koutsouras@imec.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-9630
George G MalliarasElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-8501
Geert LangereisIMEC NL, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-4447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioelectronic Medicine (BEM), which uses implantable electronic medical devices to interface with electrically active tissues, aspires to revolutionize the way we understand and fight disease. By leveraging knowledge from microelectronics, materials science, information technology, neuroscience and medicine, BEM promises to offer novel solutions that address unmet clinical needs and change the concept of therapeutics. This perspective communicates our vision for the future of BEM and presents the necessary steps that need to be taken and the challenges that need to be faced before this new technology can flourish.

Indexed as

Bioelectronic medicineClosed-loop and targeted therapiesImplantable bioelectronicsMedical devicesNeuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID39164790
PMCPMC11337583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.