Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164755›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2024

Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: a qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience.

Nicholas V Nguyen, Andres H Guillen Lozoya, Maria A Caruso, Maria Graciela D Capetillo Porraz, Laura M Pacheco-Spann, Megan A Allyse, Amelia K Barwise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Interpreters don't tell you everything": experiences with medical interpretation among Latino cancer patients and caregivers with limited English proficiency.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas V NguyenBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andres H Guillen LozoyaDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Maria A CarusoCommunity Based Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Maria Graciela D Capetillo PorrazLanguage Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Laura M Pacheco-SpannBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Megan A AllyseBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amelia K BarwiseBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. barwise.amelia@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpanish-speakers with non-English language preference and complex medical needs suffer disparities in quality of care, safety, and health outcomes. Communication challenges during prolonged hospitalizations for complex illnesses negatively influence how this group engages in their care and decision-making while hospitalized. Limited literature capturing the perspectives of Spanish-speaking patients in this context exists. Given the impact of language barriers on care and medical decision-making, this study documents the experiences of Spanish-speaking patients with NELP and hospitalized with complex care needs as well as caregivers and community leaders.

methodsUsing community-engaged recruitment strategies and semi-structured interviews and a focus group, we gathered insights from Spanish-speaking patients hospitalized for prolonged periods, caregivers, and community leaders from three geographic regions. Data were deidentified, transcribed, translated, coded in duplicate, and analyzed guided by grounded theory using NVivo.

resultsWe interviewed 40 participants: 27 patients, 10 caregivers and 3 community leaders. We identified four major themes: (1) Disconnected experiences impeding interactions, communication, and decision-making (2) Inadequate interpreter services (3) Benefits and consequences of family at the bedside (4) Community -informed recommendations.

conclusionThe study showed that in-person interpreters were preferred to virtual interpreters; yet interpreter access was suboptimal. This resulted in ad hoc family interpretation. Participants noted language negatively impacted patient's hospital experience, including decreasing confidence in medical decision-making. Recommendations from patients, caregivers, and community leaders included expanding interpreter access, bolstering interpreter quality and accuracy, and increasing resources for patient education.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunication BarriersHispanic or LatinoLanguageMedical InterpretingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHospitalizationHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedCommunity engaged researchCOVID-19Health equityHispanic populationsInterpreterLanguage barriersNELP

Identifiers

PMID39164755
PMCPMC11337574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.