Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164742›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2024

"I will take part in the revolution with our people": a qualitative study of healthcare workers' experiences of violence and resistance after the 2021 Myanmar coup d'etat.

Rohini J Haar, Katerina Crawford, Larissa Fast, Than Htut Win, Leonard Rubenstein, Karl Blanchet, Louis Lillywhite, Nicholus Tint-Zaw, Myo-Myo Mon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Aging in Southeast Asia and Japan: Challenges and opportunities.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rohini J HaarUniversity of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA. rohinihaar@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-984X
Katerina CrawfordRIAH Consortium., Stockholm, SE, Sweden.
Larissa FastRIAH Project; Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-4531
Than Htut WinIndependent researcher, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Leonard RubensteinJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-198X
Karl BlanchetFaculty of Medicine, Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-8020
Louis LillywhiteChatham House, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-6805
Nicholus Tint-ZawRIAH Project, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.
Myo-Myo MonFreelance Researcher, Naypyidaw, Myanmar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4337-9754

Funding

FCDO R123422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Myanmar, ongoing conflict since the 2021 military coup d'etat has been characterized by targeted violence against health workers (HWs), particularly those participating in the pro-democracy movement. Existing knowledge about the challenges faced by health workers in Myanmar is scant, including their perspectives on mitigating their suffering and the broader impact on community health. This knowledge gap prompted our study to assess the extent of the violence, its impact on the workers and the community, and identify resource priorities.

methodsThis qualitative study employed purposive and snowball sampling to recruit health workers affiliated with the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM). We interviewed 24 HWs in Myanmar between July and December 2022, predominantly physicians and nurses. We used a semi-structured interview guide and conducted interviews remotely due to the security situation. We adopted content analysis to understand participation in the CDM movement, experiences of violence, personal and professional impacts, the sequelae to community health, how HWs responded as well as their ongoing needs.

resultsThematic content analysis revealed that violence was both individually targeted and widespread. Health workers faced professional, financial, and personal impacts as a result. The health system as a whole has been severely diminished. Health workers have had to adapt to continue to provide care, for example some fled to rural areas and worked clandestinely, exchanging their services for food and shelter. In those settings, they continued to face insecurity from airstrikes and arrests. Health workers have also experienced moral distress and burden due to their resistance and protest against the regime.

conclusionThe coup and ensuing violence severely disrupted the healthcare system, resulting in shortages of supplies, reduced quality of care, and exacerbated challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite facing significant hardships, HWs remained resilient, engaging in resistance efforts within the CDM and seeking support from local communities and international organizations. They expressed a need for increased awareness, financial assistance, and concrete support for the health system to address the crisis.

Indexed as

Attacks on healthCivil disobedience MovementConflictHealthcare workersMyanmarViolence against healthcareWar crimes

Identifiers

PMID39164742
PMCPMC11334443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.