ArticleBMC public health2024
Joint decision on contraceptive use and determinant factors among married women of reproductive ages (15-49) in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis using Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey; 2016 data.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sociodemographic determinants of contraceptive intention among young adult women (15-24) in Nigeria: the role of age at first sex and region of residence.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and predictors of modern contraceptive method utilization among married couples in the pastoralist communities of Fentale district, Eastern Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access, and Sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContraceptive usage in Ethiopia is significantly influenced by the decision-maker at the household level. Joint decision-making involving both women and their husbands/partners is considered ideal for improving contraceptive uptake among women and for managing health outcomes related to contraceptive side effects. However, there is a lack of substantial evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of joint decision-making on contraceptive use in Ethiopia. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the magnitude of joint decision-making on contraceptive use and its determinant factors among married, contraceptive-using, reproductive-age women in Ethiopia.
methodsThis study was conducted based on the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) 2016 data. A total weighted sample of 3,669 married, contraceptive-using, reproductive-age women were included in the study. Multilevel logistic regression was employed due to the hierarchical nature of the data. Variables with a p-value of ≤ 0.2 in the bivariate multilevel analysis were included in the multivariable multilevel analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the direction and strength of associations. Variables with a p-value of < 0.05 in the multivariable multilevel analysis were considered statistically significant for joint decision-making on contraceptive use.
resultsThe prevalence of joint decision-making on contraceptive use in Ethiopia was 78.81% [95% CI: 71.35-74.23%]. Several factors were found to be statistically significant in relation to joint decision-making on contraceptive use: Women educational level primary, secondary, and higher (Adjusted odds' ratio (AOR = 1.5; CI 1.2-1.9), (AOR = 1.9; CI 1.3-2.9), and (AOR = 2.1; CI 1.2-3.5) respectively, protestant in religion (AOR = 1.7; CI 1.7-2.5), wealth status rich (AOR = 1.4; CI 1.1-1.9), media exposure (AOR = 1.4; CI 1.1-1.9), and community poverty high (AOR = 0.6; CI 0.6-0.9).
conclusionsIn Ethiopia, the majority of contraceptive users are married, reproductive-age women, and their decision to use contraceptives is typically made jointly with their husbands or partners. Factors positively associated with joint decision-making on contraceptive use include women's educational level (primary, secondary, and higher), being Protestant, having a higher wealth status, and media exposure. Conversely, women living in communities with high poverty levels are less likely to make joint decisions about contraceptive use. Health care providers, health care programmers and policy makers should be focused on these determinant factors to enhance joint decision-making in women's contraceptive use in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.