Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164629›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2024

Anthropogenic disturbance has altered the habitat of two Azorean endemic coastal plants.

Rúben M Correia Rego, Mónica Moura, Maria Olangua-Corral, Guilherme Roxo, Roberto Resendes, Luís Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rúben M Correia RegoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, R. Mãe de Deus 13A, Ponta Delgada, 9500-321, Portugal. ruben.mc.rego@uac.pt.
Mónica MouraCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, R. Mãe de Deus 13A, Ponta Delgada, 9500-321, Portugal.
Maria Olangua-CorralBanco Germoplasma & Dpto. Biología Reproductiva, Jardín Botánico Canario "Viera y Clavijo" - u.a. CSIC, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Guilherme RoxoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, R. Mãe de Deus 13A, Ponta Delgada, 9500-321, Portugal.
Roberto ResendesCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, R. Mãe de Deus 13A, Ponta Delgada, 9500-321, Portugal.
Luís SilvaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade dos Açores, R. Mãe de Deus 13A, Ponta Delgada, 9500-321, Portugal.

Funding

Cooperation Programme INTERREG MAC 2014-2020 MACFLOR2 (MAC2/4.6d/386)Direção Regional da Ciência e Transição Digital M1.1.C/PROJ. EXPLORATÓRIOS/011/2022Foundation for Science and Technology UIDB/50027/2020Fundo Regional para a Ciência e Tecnologia CONCURSO PRO-SCIENTIA/FRCT/2021/M3.1.a/001, ref. of application: M3.1.a/F/014/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthropogenic threats are causing alteration of coastal areas worldwide. Most of the coastal biodiversity is endangered, taking a particular toll on island ecosystems, like the Azores. To better understand the biotic and abiotic factors constraining the distribution and conservation status of two endemic plants, Azorina vidalii (Campanulaceae) and Lotus azoricus (Fabaceae), we performed a global survey of coastal plant communities in the archipelago, also covering environmental descriptors, natural and anthropogenic threats. Moreover, we revised their IUCN conservation status and estimated the population fractions within protected areas.

resultsNon-indigenous plants were commonly found in plots with or without the target endemics, contributing to the absence of well-defined coastal plant communities. Nonetheless, indigenous taxa commonly occurred at the plots with L. azoricus. With a larger area of occurrence, A. vidalii ecological niche differed from that of L. azoricus, the latter being restricted to dry and rocky sea cliffs, mostly in Santa Maria Island. Besides the presence of invasive plants, signs of habitat destruction, trampling and grazing, and of natural threats, such as coastal erosion, were commonly observed.

conclusionsOccurrence data indicated an endangered status for both species, although this would change to critically endangered for L. azoricus when using smaller-sized occurrence cells. Both species are threatened since their habitat is restricted to a very narrow vegetation belt, strongly limited by sea influence and human pressure, and with the frequent presence of invasive plants. While focusing on two endemic plants, our study allowed a broader view of the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on Azorean coastal plant communities.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnthropogenic EffectsAzoresBiodiversityEndangered SpeciesFabaceaeAnthropogenic disturbanceCampanula VidaliiCoastal degradationCoastal plant communitiesConservationInvasive speciesLotus Azoricus

Identifiers

PMID39164629
PMCPMC11337623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.