Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164595›Full record

ArticleLung2024

Examination of Firefighting as an Occupational Exposure Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening.

Savan K Shah, Seungjun Kim, Arsalan A Khan, Vaishnavi Krishnan, Ann M Lally, Palmi N Shah, Gillian C Alex, Christopher W Seder, Michael J Liptay, Nicole M Geissen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Savan K ShahDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Seungjun KimDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Arsalan A KhanDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Vaishnavi KrishnanDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ann M LallyDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Palmi N ShahDivision of Body Imaging Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gillian C AlexDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Christopher W SederDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Michael J LiptayDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Nicole M GeissenDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W Harrison St, Suite 774, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Nicole_Geissen@rush.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFirefighting is known to be carcinogenic to humans. However, current lung cancer screening guidelines do not account for occupational exposure. We hypothesize that firefighting is an independent risk factor associated with the development of high-risk lung nodules on low-dose CT (LDCT).

methodsMembers of a firefighter's union underwent LDCT at a single institution between April 2022 and June 2023 within a lung cancer screening program. Results were interpreted by designated chest radiologists and reported using the Lung-RADS scoring system. Demographic and radiographic data were recorded, and summary statistics are reported.

results1347 individuals underwent lung cancer screening, with a median age of 51 years (IQR 42-58), including 56 (4.2%) females. Overall, 899 (66.7%) were never smokers, 345 (25.6%) were former smokers, and 103 (7.7%) were current smokers. There were 41 firefighters (3.0%) who had high-risk (Lung-RADS 3 or 4) nodules requiring intervention or surveillance, of which 21 (1.5%) were Lung-RADS 3 and 20 (1.5%) that were Lung-RADS 4. Of the firefighters with high-risk nodules, only 6 (14.6%) were eligible for LDCT based on current screening guidelines. There were 7 high-risk nodules (0.5%) that required procedural intervention, 6 (85.7%) of which were from the non-screening eligible cohort. There were also 20 never-smoking firefighters (57.1%) with high-risk nodules that were non-screening eligible.

conclusionFirefighting, even in the absence of smoking history, may be associated with the development of high-risk lung nodules on LDCT. Carefully selected occupational exposures should be considered in the development of future lung cancer screening guidelines.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFirefightersLung NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRisk FactorsSmokingFirefightingLow-dose CTLung cancerLung cancer screeningOccupational exposure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.