Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164548›Full record

ArticleActa parasitologica2024

The Low Genetic Diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis Isolates in Southwest Turkey and Analysis of Clinical Findings.

Erdogan Malatyali, Ozgur Guclu, Ibrahim Yildiz, Sema Ertug, Hatice Ertabaklar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta parasitologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular epidemiology of Dientamoeba fragilis coinfections with Blastocystis sp. and Giardia duodenalis in symptomatic patients from Valencia, Spain.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Molecular detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erdogan MalatyaliDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 09100, Turkey. erdogan.malatyali@adu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-467X
Ozgur GucluDepartment of Plant and Animal Production, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Sultanhisar MYO, Aydin, 09100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-4715
Ibrahim YildizDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 09100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-6280
Sema ErtugDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 09100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6448-7482
Hatice ErtabaklarDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 09100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-6433

Funding

the Scientific and Technological Research Counsil of Turkey (TUBITAK) 220S421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) is a common intestinal protozoan with a global distribution. In the present study, we aimed to determine genetic diversity of D. fragilis isolates with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) in the southwest of Turkey and analyse the clinical findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included faecal samples from 200 individuals in Aydin, Turkey. The positivity of D. fragilis was determined with 18 S rRNA gene-based PCR assay. Six nested-PCR reactions were set to amplify partial D. fragilis housekeeping genes in the positive samples. The sequences were aligned with the references from GenBank to detect nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes. Additionally, the clinical findings and demographic characteristics of patients were statistically analysed between D. fragilis-infected and non-infected cases.

resultsThe positivity of D. fragilis was 16% (32 out of 200 cases) with 18 S rRNA based-PCR, and all were classified as "genotype 1". The analysis of six MLST loci revealed different haplotypes only at one locus; the remaining five loci exhibited no polymorphisms. The haplotypes in the present study were identical to at least one previously reported reference, except the locus "large subunit of RNA polymerase II" locus. There were no significant differences in any of the clinical findings or demographic characteristics between the infected and non-infected groups.

conclusionsOur study revealed a low genetic diversity of D. fragilis isolates from Turkey, like other countries including Italy, Denmark, the UK, Australia, and Brazil. The high degree of sequence similarity in housekeeping genes indicated the clonal distribution of D. fragilis.

Indexed as

DientamoebaDientamoebiasisGenetic VariationMultilocus Sequence TypingAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDNA, ProtozoanFecesFemaleGenotypeHaplotypesHumansInfantDNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18SClinical findingDientamoeba fragilisDiversityGenotypeMultilocus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.