ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2024
Holistic in silico developability assessment of novel classes of small proteins using publicly available sequence-based predictors.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional study on the first-in-human trials of anticancer drugs in Japan and the United States and the probability of approval.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of novel therapeutic proteins is a lengthy and costly process, with an average attrition rate of 91% (Thomas et al. Clinical Development Success Rates and Contributing Factors 2011-2020, 2021). To increase the probability of success and ensure robust drug supply beyond approval, it is essential to assess the developability profile of new potential drug candidates as early and broadly as possible in development (Jain et al. MAbs, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.06.002 ). Predicting these properties in silico is expected to be the next leap in innovation as it would enable significantly reduced development timelines combined with broader screens at lower costs. However, developing predictive algorithms typically requires substantial datasets generated under very defined conditions, a limiting factor especially for new classes of therapeutic proteins that hold immense clinical promise. Here we describe a strategy for assessing the developability of a novel class of small therapeutic Anticalin® proteins using machine learning in conjunction with a knowledge-driven approach. The knowledge-driven approach considers developability attributes such as aggregation propensity, charge variants, immunogenicity, specificity, thermal stability, hydrophobicity, and potential post-translational modifications, to calculate a holistic developability score. Based on sequence-derived descriptors as input parameters we established novel statistical models designed to predict the developability scores for Anticalin proteins. The best models yielded low root mean square errors across the entire dataset and were further validated by removing input data from individual screening campaigns and predicting developability scores for those drug candidates. The adoption of the described workflow will enable significantly streamlined preclinical development of Anticalin drug candidates and could potentially be applied to other therapeutic protein scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39164492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.