ArticleScientific reports2024
An overview of Synlab SDN Biobank's quality control system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biobanks are valuable service units that ensure the usage of high-quality biological samples. They contribute to translational research, and their support may improve future therapeutic approaches. They store biological samples that can be used to examine circulation biomarkers, immune cells, and immunohistochemistry aspects of illnesses and further in-depth examinations using NGS techniques. The IRCCS Synlab SDN Biobank has about 70,000 well-preserved cryopreserved human samples from various diseases, primarily oncological but also neurological and cardiovascular. These biospecimens were taken from 25,000 participants underwent imaging with a contrast agent. The goal is to propose quality control assays that meet the requirements of the international standard ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 20387:2020 accreditation. PBMCs viability was determined, and immune subset cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Furthermore, the expression of ubiquitous miRNAs was used to assess plasma sample integrity. The quality controls demonstrated that the biological samples were correctly cryopreserved; the preservation of human biological samples did not affect the quality of the biological samples tested. Indeed, the cryopreserved PBMCs had a vitality of more than 80%, and the lymphocyte subsets could be selected for future immune cell investigations. Furthermore, miRNA expression was highest in thawed plasma samples compared to the positive and negative controls. We evaluated the quality of our randomly selected biobank-thawed human samples. Both PBMCs and plasma samples fulfill the high-quality standards needed for biomedical research, assuring their long-term preservation. However, further research is needed in the biobanking field to establish globally accepted procedures to confirm the quality of biological samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.