ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel approach for automatic classification of macular degeneration OCT images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on deep learning-based lesion identification in optical coherence tomography.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- MultiModal craniocerebral diagnose based on 3D CT and image reports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Network for Accurate Retinal Multidisease Diagnosis Using Multiview Fusion of En Face and B-Scan Images: A Multicenter Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Models to Predict the Onset or Recurrence of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are significant causes of blindness worldwide. The prevalence of these diseases is steadily increasing due to population aging. Therefore, early diagnosis and prevention are crucial for effective treatment. Classification of Macular Degeneration OCT Images is a widely used method for assessing retinal lesions. However, there are two main challenges in OCT image classification: incomplete image feature extraction and lack of prominence in important positional features. To address these challenges, we proposed a deep learning neural network model called MSA-Net, which incorporates our proposed multi-scale architecture and spatial attention mechanism. Our multi-scale architecture is based on depthwise separable convolution, which ensures comprehensive feature extraction from multiple scales while minimizing the growth of model parameters. The spatial attention mechanism is aim to highlight the important positional features in the images, which emphasizes the representation of macular region features in OCT images. We test MSA-NET on the NEH dataset and the UCSD dataset, performing three-class (CNV, DURSEN, and NORMAL) and four-class (CNV, DURSEN, DME, and NORMAL) classification tasks. On the NEH dataset, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 98.1%, 97.9%, and 98.0%, respectively. After fine-tuning on the UCSD dataset, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 96.7%, 96.7%, and 98.9%, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate the excellent classification performance and generalization ability of our model compared to previous models and recent well-known OCT classification models, establishing it as a highly competitive intelligence classification approach in the field of macular degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.