ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validity and Reliability of Portable Blood Lactate Analyzers: A Systematic Review with COSMIN and GRADE Assessment.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Method-dependent differences in VO₂ peak determination and their implications for percentage-based exercise prescription in elite rowers.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Validation of a novel handheld lactate analyzer reveals concentration-dependent bias compared with a laboratory reference device.Biology open · 2026Article
- Multivariate dynamic association analysis between sprint interval training and adolescent freestyle swimming performance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Maximal lactate accumulation rate (European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Inspiratory muscle warm up improves 400 m performance in elite male runners.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.
methodsBlood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.
resultsFingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).
conclusionsBlood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39164441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.